Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Zadrozny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:11, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Zadrozny[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability - does not meet WP:GNG Peter Rehse (talk) 12:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Couldn't find any sources. The cited ones are very weak. Interview by a family member? Really? I was going to say WP:VANITY by WP:SPA but it appears to be a student project (Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/UMASS-Amherst/COMM 394RI- Race and Gender in Sitcoms), so instead it seems like the possible failure on the part of the instructor to vet the topic for WP:GNG (through there is still a chance the student is writing a bio of a family member, given the cited source of family member interview...). (PS. I have reviewed other articles created by that course,and they seem high quality; further this article is not listed on the talk page, so this is likely some student side project that didn't get communicated well to the instructor...). Bottom line: Local history is great, but not all of it is encyclopedic. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I don't find any additional sources, either. Smmurphy^(Talk) 17:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.