Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Woodrow Wilson (fashion executive)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as an individual lacking notability, per A7 and WP:V. As others noted in this AfD, reliable sources cannot be located. Information that cannot be verified must be removed, per BLP. Jamie S93^❤ 15:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Woodrow Wilson (fashion executive)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly seems to fail the notability guideline, and there are problems with verifiability as well. A google search on the full name turns up a lot of hits for Robert Woodrow Wilson (who is clearly notable), but I'm not sure there are any at all for the "fashion executive" aside from Wiki mirrors. Google News archive stories pertain to the physicist and other RWW's who had obituaries. The two "sources" linked in the article say nothing about Robert Woodrow Wilson. It seems clear there is not significant coverage in reliable sources, and indeed so far I cannot even determine if this person exists, i.e. verifiability is at much at issue as notability. Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 06:49, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article is not sourced. If he is notable, no one would ever know from this article. USchick (talk) 04:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. I can't find any sources either, so it appears the content isn't verifiable, let alone notable. -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 10:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.