Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Volpe
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:50, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Robert Volpe[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Robert Volpe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of the article is not notable. There is no notability standard for police officers but he was an art theft detective and his son was involved in an infamous incident of police brutality. That doesn't seem to merit a wikipedia article.Yousef Raz (talk) 05:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:28, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No sources/reference citations in the article text so I can't validate how reliable it is. Leaning towards delete. Oaktree b (talk) 22:42, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.