Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Thornton Henderson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Thornton Henderson[edit]

Robert Thornton Henderson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. Created by SPA and later expanded by another SPA using the same name as the subject. Unreferenced and searching doesn't turn up much. His books can be found listed for sale on Amazon, but are not very popular. MB 00:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm not finding any indication that this author or his books are of any importance whatsoever. They all seem to be the evangelical equivalent of pulp, mostly or all published by outlets who specialize in turning out lots and lots of the same. TimothyJosephWood 16:23, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:33, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 02:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.