Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Sun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus for both but I will be redirecting the former to the letter per WP:BLP as it's poorly sourced Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Sun[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this game inventor notable? Nothing I see suggests that he is. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 22:10, 17 March 2012 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related article for deletion:[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:19, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure of the guy, but the 24 game has merit and its page should be kept. Just google and read! --Paddy (talk) 18:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to 24 Game. Nothing here justifies a separate article. Tigerboy1966 22:38, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't think the way this AfD is presented is very helpful. 24 Game should be separated from this discussion. Tigerboy1966 18:17, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I listed 24 Game as well because I also don't find it notable. If the feeling is that the game is notable but not the person, you can note that (as you kind of have) in your opinion. --Nlu (talk) 03:16, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It could well be that a person is much less worthy than something they invent or are involved in. Whilst the person may not merit a separate entry, their inventions should be assessed separately. It seems wrong to include discussion of the deletion of 24 game here. --Paddy (talk) 08:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 14:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 06:12, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.