Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Rooks (promoter)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Rooks (promoter)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Notability has not been established through significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Outside of IMDb and social networking sites, coverage appears to be court documents pertaining to a lawsuit in which the subject was involved. Cind.amuse 21:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete IMDb is not a reliable source and there are no other sources offered. When I search for sources, I find a game warden, a veterinarian, a criminal and an NAACP official with the same name, all getting more media attention. This particular Robert Rooks is not notable due to lack of reliable sources discussing him in depth. Cullen328 (talk) 23:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This article originally replaced the vet's article in an edit by Robrooks (talk · contribs). When the vet article was restored, I went into the history and placed the text in this article. The username of the article's creator tells us a lot. I myself have no opinion on this. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 07:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 14:21, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.