Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Robideau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Robideau[edit]

Contains unsourced attacks on groups and persons. I'm thinking speedy, but bringing it here to make sure there's concensus. Mgm|^(talk) 11:05, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't see much on the article that is encyclopedic. Fetofs 11:30, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I can't see what the title of the page has to do with the article...? Somewhere in there, maybe there is a an event worthy of an article, but it would need drastic cleanup. As it stands, it breaches WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, and fails to state the context of the article. --Whouk (talk) 11:10, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Maybe this can get you an idea of why the name of the article is Robert Robideau. Fetofs 11:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That clears up a few things indeed. Someone complained to the info-en mailing on his behalf on how someone kept changing it. Normally, I would explain how material on Wikipedia is free to edit, but the crux of it is, that press releases aren't encyclopedic. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:16, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think there may be a article buried in there somewhere but I don't know that mining equipment can operate at that depth. Avalon 12:55, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- giant pile of press release of questionable relevance to subject of article. Haikupoet 04:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per nom. Arbustoo 09:28, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you please specify which of the criteria for speedy deletion this meets, or amend your vote? Stifle 12:06, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete -- has almost nothing to do with title of article, totally POV. It's a political screed from the world of radical Indian politics.Verklempt 20:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you please specify which of the criteria for speedy deletion this meets, or amend your vote?
  - It's an "attack page", accusing unnamed "AIM leaders" of murder, people who haven't even been indicted, much less convicted.Verklempt 23:25, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stifle 12:06, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:NOR, POV rant and bordering on A6 speedy. Stifle 12:06, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.