Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Rønnes (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Rønnes[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable musician. Whilst WP:BEFORE shows evidence that he has released recordings, there are no reliable independent sources that would demonstrate notability under WP:GNG. AfD result in 2010 was Keep but with no evidence of secondary sources located since then. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article has zero sources that are indepdent, reliable secondary sources. Listings in a set of holdings of works by a person do not prove notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet GNG. – DarkGlow (talk)}
Delete per nom Devokewater (talk) 20:37, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there are fairly broad claims, but little evidence to back them up. Bearian (talk) 03:13, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.