Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert O'Maoilriain
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Robert O'Maoilriain[edit]
- Robert O'Maoilriain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD was removed by author, so I'm putting this on AFD. Feels like half spam, half vanity article. Subject might be notable (but I suspect it might be Robert himself creating the article) but the text reads like a promotional bio. XXX antiuser eh? 18:07, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I removed the background section as it was a direct copy violation of the bio on the website, only with 'I' changed to 'he', which is still a copyvio. Ravendrop 18:12, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment With Ravendrop's changes above, the only remaining ref is his own website. Doesn't seem to meet WP:NOTE. XXX antiuser eh? 18:13, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Severely underreferenced, and notability not established enough. Wikipedian2 (talk) 22:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The only claim to notability appears to be the recent creation of an obscure online magazine. Even if the articles on the magazine and the person were merged, I doubt the result would still merit inclusion. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:36, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.