Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Miles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep per WP:SNOW. Artist has charted singles that can easily be verified; that alone is generally enough to pass WP:MUSIC. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:55, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Miles[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no major music coverage Ubot16 (talk) 02:06, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep The artist is vastly well known in the UK and should perhaps never been nominated. scope_creep (talk) 3:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Strong (even speedy) keep He has had Top 40 UK chart hits and so more than passes notability criteria. Keresaspa (talk) 03:00, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Obviously notable.--Michig (talk) 05:55, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - three top 5 hits in the UK, including one which was awarded a platinum disc, obviously notable -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:58, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Yeah, it's a BLP lacking sources. Still, I'm absolutely stunned that this was nominated. Scratching my head now. Sure the article needs some work, but it clearly shows his body of work and states that he is an award-winning musician with a platinum album. Cindamuse (talk) 13:50, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.