Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Kaiser (entertainer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Kaiser (entertainer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. WP:BLP of a drag queen and bit part actor, whose most substantive claim of encyclopedic notability is being awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Golden Jubilee Medal in 2003 -- but that's a low-level one-off honour which was granted to 46,000 people in Canada simply to honor their records of local community involvement, so it's not a thing that can hand a person inclusion in an encyclopedia in and of itself. But nothing else here is especially noteworthy, and WP:GNG has not been passed either as there's just one single unreliable source for referencing. Bearcat (talk) 17:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

likely keep - not great article, but a trivial WP:BEFORE brings up a fair bit of evidence that he's noteworthy and well-known: [1][2][3][4] this is in two minutes with Google. I fully expect there will be paper-based coverage as well - David Gerard (talk) 17:15, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Empress in the Imperial Court system, granted Jubilee Honors, plenty of good sources available. Bearian (talk) 00:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per David Gerard. Although not sourced, the examples clearly shows he is notable enough to have an article. Article just needs cleaned up a bit and sourced. Chase (talk) 03:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.