Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Heinich, Michael Molenda, James Russell (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:47, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Robert Heinich, Michael Molenda, James Russell[edit]
This was prodded, but it (miraculously) had previously survived VfD. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Heinich, Michael Molenda, James Russell, which resulted in no consensus, though no one actually wanted to keep the article as it was. User:ERcheck said "seems to be copied off of an old faculty website, Heinrich & Russell no longer with IU, Molenda retired; makes no sense to have an article on all three ". I couldn't tell you if anyone is important enough to have an article out of this bunch or it should be deleted outright. NickelShoe 21:22, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete page. James D. Russell may meet WP:BIO and if that is the case, he should get his own article. The other 2 appear not to.--Isotope23 21:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ⇒ BRossow T/C 21:37, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, and split into three articles, and let the individual articles stand or fall on their own merits. There's no sensible way one article should be covering three people unless they're triplets (cf. Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen). Peter Grey 08:05, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.