Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Defelice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:00, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Robert defelice[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, non notable. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 12:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability provided, and the article reads like something from a book jacket. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 15:03, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails every notability standard for a bio. Qworty (talk) 02:55, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable.--Staberinde (talk) 13:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unreferenced BLP. After a couple of quick Internet searches, I can't find anything about him, except for one article from over 10 years ago about a development in the Boston area. Bearian (talk) 22:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is a PR WP:PUFF piece having no WP:RS. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 15:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.