Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert DeProspero

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 17:02, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Robert DeProspero[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A secret service man. The only actually independent source is a mention in a book about the Secret Service, not about this subject. Guy (Help!) 22:19, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I found news coverage either mentioning him or interviewing him over a 25 year period from 1973 to 1998. The AP published an article about him in 1985. There are various other mentions of him in books discussing Reagan and/or the US Secret Service I'm leaning "keep", but I'm interested to see what others may find. - Location (talk) 23:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:40, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - he was head of the President's security detail. Bearian (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - That he ascended beyond being a regular secret service agent to the head of the President's security detail and influenced procedure seems to be relatively notable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.