Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Currie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:50, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Currie[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not exactly sure if this meets WP:ARTIST. Let's determine here. bender235 (talk) 23:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment All nominators should read and apply WP:BEFORE before nominating. It is WP policy that they should also use an WP:RFC for gathering a consensus on an article, but you certainly are not the first to do otherwise. Anarchangel (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wow, WP:ARTIST is pretty strict - no way he meets it. If it was up to me I might liberalize it some, but even then he might not make it. He doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG even. Google is pretty damning: not counting this article and his own website, there are a whole bunch of people named Robert Currie who come up before he does. He's one of the five most notable Robert Curries, I guess. He needs to get some writeups in mainstream publications, or win an award, or something, before he rates an article, I'd say. Herostratus (talk) 01:58, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete appears to fail WP:ARTIST. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.