Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Burton (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 05:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Burton (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. Seems to have had a role in Lassie, but not sure if it was large enough to demonstrate notability. Natg 19 (talk) 21:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 21:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 21:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:57, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:58, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:58, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I looked for coverage of him as an author, and he's definitely not notable that way. I can't yet comment on his acting. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:42, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 08:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - Appears to have led an interesting life, but the acting history primarily consists of single episode appearances and not sufficient to convey notability.--Rpclod (talk) 10:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final, would close as no consensus if not for !delete
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nightfury 10:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Meh Very borderline. Is attached to notable things, his wife, and job and several notable shows, but NOTINHERIT, and a lot of those things are run of the mill. All those guilds are to be expected, yet the participation in movies and shows makes me not want this page to go.L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 16:26, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.