Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Breuler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience ^t 23:11, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Breuler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Accomplishments don`t satisfy WP:ACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:09, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 08:40, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 08:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:- Subject of the article meet WP:GNG and passes WP:NACTOR#3. He had made unique, prolific and innovative contributions to a field of entertainment which earned him the Joseph Jefferson Award per this source. He is a receiver of American Top Acting Award per this Chicago Tribune. He is one of the 10 America's Top Stage Actors Selected For the Lunt-Fontanne Fellowship Program per this source. I also found other RS like this one, this one, American theater magzine, this Cambridge Guide to American Theatre, this, this, this and this one, to mention few. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 20:46, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply. You need more than passing mentions. Also, the fellowship and the Joseph Jefferson Award appear to be fairly minor; the award is a local one ~~and winners are chosen by a volunteer non-profit committee~~. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Am aware that notability requires more than a passing mention but that is not the case in the sources provided above. You mean Joseph Jefferson Award is a minor award simply because its winners are often chosen by a volunteer non-profit committee? I want to let you know that over 70% notable award winners are often chosen by a volunteer non-profit committee. For example see see this, this and this one, unrelated to the subject of the article under discussion but provide valuable information related to your claim. Another example is the Academy Awards in which the Special Academy Awards are voted on by special committees, rather than by the Academy membership as a whole. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 22:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:52, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:21, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Esquivalience ^t 01:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 01:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.