Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:04, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Robert (film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable film which fails WP:NFO —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 16:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 16:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 16:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: As WP:NFO's are not notability criteria and are simply attributes to consider which usually apply to older films, perhaps the nominator instead wished to refer to WP:NF. That said, the thing has coverage but not in suitable sources. Time for looking beyond the article. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.}

year/type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

alt title:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Germany:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:13, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I can't find good sources on this one. Willing to change my mind if someone can do a better job. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:59, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.