Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Wells
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 16:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rob Wells[edit]
- Rob Wells (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Fail WP:BIO. The only "Rob Wells" I can find information on are the people the article says he is not. Movingboxes (talk) 05:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Kleinzach 06:05, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a social networking site, where humorous profiles such as this are acceptable. --Dhartung | Talk 06:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: not notable.--Grahame (talk) 07:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per WP:BIO and WP:V (absolutely not references, and movingboxes hasn't found any other information, either), as the unprodding admin. I unprodded since I didn't think it would be a good idea to delete it as a proposed deletion, but make up my own reason (failing WP:BIO or WP:V, for example). --Maxim (☎) 13:54, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - Okay, come on. This looks like a genuine prank. No references, either, obviously not notable, and no encyclopedic value. No, Rob. --Lord₪Sunday 21:13, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.