Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RobApps (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 18:43, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RobApps[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable iphone app company. No secondary sources provided and none to be found on Google news. Previous afd closed as no-consensus due to no one participating, but this article is a borderline nn/promo speedy candidate and should not remain. Electrified Fooling Machine (talk) 02:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not sure how the last AFD didn't get delete votes, there is barely a superficial claim of notability and it is totally unsupported by independent sources. Reads like an advertisement. Surprised no one has tried to CSD it, but I guess with a past AFD it wouldn't be appropriate. Monty₈₄₅ 03:39, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no 3rd party refs to establish notability; created by an SPA so probable spam.Dialectric (talk) 01:46, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.