Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roadgeek (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Nominator is likely a sock, and this is possibly a pointy nomination given how recently the last afd closed. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 16:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roadgeek[edit]

This article, Roadgeek, has remained a mess. Most of it is trivia and almost all of it deals with the United States and not the world. I strongly recommend a transwiki to Wiktionary. Splat5572 (talk) 00:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I don't see what's changed from the last nomination and this one. I don't think this is necessary as it's only been five days since the last one, but that's just me - C L — 00:57, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Really, is this really up here again? Yes, it needs to be expanded, but there are thousands of articles that are on wikipedia that need to be expanded. While I agree that maybe this should be added to wikitionary, I do not believe that this article should be transwiki-ied there. Thats my two cents. Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 01:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — I would suggest that he nominator rework the article rather than re-nominate it again for deletion. Consensus seems to be 6 times around that an article on this subject should be included. Yes, the article needs cleanup, but it will take some time to edit it. Imzadi1979 (talk) 01:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- This article was nominated by someone listed on Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Artisol2345 (2nd); and WP:USRD has been informed. --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 01:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep This nomination is an abuse of process. There was no consensus last week, there will be no consensus in favor of transwiki or delete this week. The nominator has recently edited several of the previously closed AfDs. The nominator is not only suspected of being a sock puppet of a user with a history of abuse, but has deleted tags and warnings on its talk page 11 times this month, despite warnings not to do so. See the history of the talk page at [1] or go directly to warnings at these links: [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. It is clear that posting warnings on Splat's talk page is not helpful. Perhaps somebody who knows how could look into dealing with this user.--Hjal (talk) 04:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.