Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ro Glez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete A7. -- GB fan 10:47, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ro Glez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Author removed Speedy Deletion tag by stating that "This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because everything is important nowadays". Aust331 (talk) 08:26, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think this page should be deleted, Wikipedia was made to help and make each other´s life easier, what we are doing here is helping them to get to people, we do not know who is going to search them but we know that with this page being here helps to promote the new generations and inspire other people. Josepereira1234 (talk)

Comment: Wikipedia does not exist to "promote the new generations" (or any others) nor to inspire. See WP:NOTPROMO. AllyD (talk) 09:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just finished reading this Wikipedia page and on my opinion it should stay there, it has a great summary about his life, what does he do, how did he start and his personal life. Everyday people want something new and I think this kind of things is what they are looking for, they want someone to inspire, as the creator of the page stated on the artist page "Trying to set a role model and show the world everything is possible", which means that the artist wants to show the world that if you want it, you can have it, that is why I think this page should stay there and help other people to get to know him better and where does he come from. Kevin franco 00 (talk) 05:11, 10 August 2016 — Kevin franco 00 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Delete (CSD A7): The author's challenge to the speedy deletion also said "there are a lot of musicians that no one knows and we can help them grow and become better at what they do... by deleting this page we are closing a path that could be the path to success" which is effectively acknowledging that the subject has not attained notability yet but hopes that he may one day. My searches are identifying nothing other than the usual social media. The article creator removed the speedy deletion, which should have been reinstated rather than going to AfD. AllyD (talk) 09:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.