Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roșia Montană Gold Corporation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Roșia Montană Project. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:28, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roșia Montană Gold Corporation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company is likely to be notable but the present article and all older versions have severe neutrality issues. Better to use WP:TNT and start all over again. The Banner talk 21:15, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep -- if you think the article is biased, fix the article. bogdan (talk) 21:31, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It is biased from the first to the last version. Your edits did not make any bit less biased, you just swung the bias in another way. This article is just beyond rescue. The Banner talk 22:29, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Roșia Montană Project. The company's notability derives solely from its one major project, which appears to be a huge controversy. This is little or nothing to say about the company other that it is running this controversial project, and that is best done in the context of the main article on the project. If there is ever more to say about the company itself, then it could be split out ... but we are nowhere near that stage for now. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - Concur with @BrownHairedGirl:. -- Whpq (talk) 16:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.