Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riyaz Gangji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 07:06, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Riyaz Gangji[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Non-notable fashion designer. Fails WP:GNG. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 08:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Way below the notability guideline. Current references add no weight and no others found via Google search. Philg88 ^♦talk 09:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 08:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 08:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The one news article included is from the past week which I found in a Google News search along with a video of him accusing MP Nilesh Rane of assault which a separate search found many more links, an additional search with "Riyaz Gangji fashion designer" found nothing aside from one news links that weren't significant or solid including this with "fashion tips". At the end of that search, I found some more results for that assault accusation. I've seen links including that current Times of India that say he was selected out of certain number of people and there doesn't seem to be anything there. Additional searches at Times of India found this and at Financial Times, photos. There are links here (including from the past 4 years) but nothing significant (no awards, other recognitions, etc.) to add to the article. SwisterTwister talk 20:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.