Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riverside Press Park

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:12, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Riverside Press Park[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a small park (by its own terms) near Boston. I don't believe it has the required coverage, outside of traditional parks and recreation pages. Shadowjams (talk) 17:10, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Just a handful of news hits, all of them trivial mentions and none of them discussing the park in significant detail, as the GNG requires. Ravenswing 05:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG. Nouse4aname (talk) 12:52, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not even worth merging to Cambridge, Massachusetts. --MelanieN (talk) 19:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.