Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riverbanks chatroom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen× ☎ 19:34, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Riverbanks chatroom and Riverbanks channel[edit]

Short article about a very unremarkable chatroom on mIRC. Should be speedy delete, but no applicable rule. Harro5 01:06, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as wonderfully non-notable. --PeruvianLlama^(spit) 02:15, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Wow. A website's suitability for discussion is divided by 20 for a forum's. A forum's (which is at least saved to disk and therefore persistent in documentary form for some time) suitability would need to be divided by 20 again for an IRC chat channel, and Wikipedia is not a web guide. Geogre 03:12, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. IRC channels are almost never encyclopedic, due to the lack of documented verifiable history, and this is no exception. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:08, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unverifiable unencyclopaedic uninteresting. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 23:58, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. I add the mirror article Riverbanks chatroom to this nom. -- Perfecto 15:45, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.