Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritmo nuevo y vieja ola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 20:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ritmo nuevo y vieja ola[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since December 2013. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable light 1960's comedy, fails WP:NFOE; although directed by prolific filmmaker Enrique Carreras and featuring a famous cast, notability is not inherited.---Darius (talk) 14:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There is a press release on the movie [1]. Dean Reed appeared in the movie. The movie also mentioned in passing many times in AR news, also in "South American Cinema: Dictionary of Film Makers" by Luis Trelles Plazaola (although I can find a cope to check what is actually said there), there was a mentioning in Diccionario de actores del cine argentino, 1933-1999. I am not sure though if it will pass for GNG. I am willing to take a deep dive on this one. Kolma8 (talk) 09:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- We all know that a press release doesn't help establish notability. Having a known actor doesn't do it either as notability is not inherited WP:NOTINHERITED, and the others as you said are "passing mentions", which also don't establish notability. The book is a dictionary of film listings...all passing mentions. So, I wish you luck in finding something that could help his pass the notability guidelines, because I couldn't. Thanks for your efforts. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Pretty scarce information is out there to support even GNG. Kolma8 (talk) 21:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a few passing mentions is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.