Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritika Ramtri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 22:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ritika Ramtri[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person is not notable. Person appears on social sites facebook, twitter, linkedin, blog pages, and one New Zealand article. Appears to be promotion. Jay (talk) 04:57, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. This fails GNG/PROMO - besides that, the first reference spammed my browser and the second is 404.► Philg88 ◄ ^talk 05:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 21:47, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO, and links aren't reliable or significant enough to justify inclusion. mikeman67 (talk) 18:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.