Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rita De Crescenzo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 04:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rita De Crescenzo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although I am the creator of the page, months later I realize that the article most likely has low encyclopedic relevance. The person in question has released various songs but only through YouTube, there is nothing on the most popular streaming platforms. They’re also songs released digitally only, and independently, without a record label. Finally, the person in question is actually a TikToker, whose relevance usually goes only to the most prominent characters. Yeagvr (talk) 17:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 20:31, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Thanks to the nominator/creator for being honest. It appears that Ms. De Crescenzo attempted to start a new career as an influencer and social media singer at age 40, and good luck to her but she has not yet been noticed by the reliable entertainment media. The sources covering her (in Italian) are clearly self-promotional vanity sites or gossip rags that comment un-informatively on passing social media trends. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 02:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.