Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Risque Disque

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:36, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Risque Disque[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost completely unsourced article, doesn't meet WP:GNG. One source is a dead link, and the other source only mentions the record label. SophisticatedSwampert ^{let's talk about that} 21:25, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:29, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:29, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This was created (by me) at a different time in the evolution of Wikipedia's notability standards: all a record label had to do to be considered notable at the time was to have notable artists releasing music on it, and the sourcing didn't actually have to clear increasingly tough later standards like WP:CORPDEPTH — it was enough to simply be able to verify that the claim to having had notable artists on it was true. But those aren't the standards that pertain today, and under contemporary standards I just can't find the sourcing needed to get it back up to snuff: all I get on a ProQuest search is glancing namechecks of its existence in coverage of either Blue Rodeo or Crash Vegas, not coverage about the label. Bearcat (talk) 05:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 18:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.