Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riskay
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Riskay[edit]
- Riskay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete. This is just another MySpace act which has received minor coverage as a result of a tasteless song title and little more. JBsupreme (talk) 09:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable; WP:MUSIC criterion 1 is the only colorable theory for inclusion, and even that fails, requiring a musician (purported or actual) to have "been the subject of multiple [and] non-trivial published works." Her mentions in the New York Times and the New Yorker are trivial, amounting to a couple of sentences buried in articles about multiple subjects.- Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 22:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I agree with the above. While the publications are reliable sources, the mentions are very trivial. Fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 10:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep*. Riskay has inspired a generation of musicians. END OFF! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.104.9 (talk) 15:13, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I came here to find out abourt Riskay. Where is the information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.6.164.238 (talk) 16:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]