Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ripostism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ripostism[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced, no indication of any notability, contested prod. WWGB (talk) 12:37, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTMADEUP. I get one hit that isn't us. Mangoe (talk) 13:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete possibly made up, completely non-notable 'philosophy'. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:23, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not in any dictionary, as far as I can find. A grand total of one non-Wikipedia Google hit, that one being a blog post. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:17, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very clearly not notable.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Appears to be a hoax or joke. I also found only one single Google hit that was not derived from this very article. Fails all notability guidelines by a wide mile. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 20:59, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.