Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riothero.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 18:32, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Riothero.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable web blog. No reliable sources to prove the wp:notability. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:37, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just another blog pushing a political POV. Why does this deserve a wikipedia article? bobrayner (talk) 18:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG. --Fauzan^{✆ talk}_{✉ mail} 18:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with the discussions, thank you.--ZiaLater (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I found only a brief mention from 2000 on Whole Earth ([1], via Highbeam, subscription reqd.) but neither that not the 2001 award nomination indicate notability. Fails WP:NWEB, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 06:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is a mention of Riothero.com in this book (purchase reqd.). Not sure if this is significant at all or worth looking at, just mentioning this.--ZiaLater (talk) 08:27, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Can't find any reliable source coverage. Sam Walton (talk) 18:56, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.