Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riley Stearns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:14, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Riley Stearns[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also nominating Jo Crocker. Two people with very minor roles in the media, whose only notability is the fact they are the husband of Mary Elizabeth Winstead and the sister of Stephen Fry respectively. Can be covered in the personal life sections of their famous connections. HornetMike (talk) 21:26, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 November 26. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 21:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Crocker, who is certainly NN. Not sure about Stearns, but he probably is too. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:39, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 23:27, 4 December 2013 (UTC)<![reply]

-- from Template:Relist -->

Delete. Stearns is not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. He was a writer's assistant and hasn't distinguished himself enough for notability.Jimsteele9999 (talk) 16:21, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.