Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riley Costello (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Riley Costello (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actor who doesn't meet the requirements of WP:NACTOR. No evidence of multiple notable roles, no awards etc. References are mostly just cast lists which just mention the subject. Tassedethe (talk) 21:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Roles in three recent Broadway productions, and one notable regional production. The sources here are the same sources as you find on similar articles. Playbill, Broadway World, New York Times, and IBDB. -Aaron Booth (talk) 21:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Two of the Broadway roles were as understudy. The regional production role was "paperboy". There is a single named role listed. Tassedethe (talk) 22:14, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It never matters what's in other articles. Read WP:OTHERCRAP. Qworty (talk) 00:20, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for abjectly failing WP:ENTERTAINER. Qworty (talk) 00:21, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:55, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Added a few more citations as well as a few more credits. -Aaron Booth (talk) 21:07, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Therefore it does now have multiple roles in notable productions, and now does pass WP:ENTERTAINER. -Aaron Booth (talk) 21:21, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:36, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No major roles. No significant coverage. --Michig (talk) 08:12, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.