Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riley Brett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:53, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Riley Brett[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brett was basically a back up and relief driver, there is no indication that he passes notability guidelines, and I was not able to find sources on him that would meet GNG. I found this [1] but just because someone somewhere included someone in their website does not mean they were notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Motorsport, and Oklahoma. Shellwood (talk) 12:31, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, appears to pass GNG, see [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] and [8]. BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:49, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - is clearly notable (great work by BeanieFan11!). Mathmo ^Talk 15:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Four times champion as a mechanic [9], also had significant success as a driver, although he never was able to win the 500. The sources provided by BeanieFan11 demonstrate significant coverage, passes WP:GNG. Jacona (talk) 16:51, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.