Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RightNow Technologies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy Keep as nomination withdrawn & no delete votes. -- JLaTondre 15:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
RightNow Technologies[edit]
This article doesn't establish notability per WP:CORP. Please note that the NASDAQ is an exchange, not an index. Being listed on NASDAQ does not make a company notable. Please read the inclusion guidelines at WP:CORP if you are unfamiliar with them. —WAvegetarian•CONTRIBUTIONSTALK• EMAIL• 00:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn per addition of references. I've just been seeing so much spamming happening at Saas that I wanted a clear boundary between what companies are notable and what aren't. Articles that didn't establish notability came here. If we're using NASDAQ as a notability indicator, let's add it to WP:CORP.—WAvegetarian•CONTRIBUTIONSTALK• EMAIL• 10:36, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems notable enough, assuming the basic facts here are true ($61 million revenue, notable clients such as Nike). It's true that NASDAQ ia an exchange, but being NASDAQ-listed is a strong indicator of notability. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:17, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep, satisfies WP:CORP criterion 1, CEO has been interviewed in CRM Buyer [1] and the company is mentioned in other companies' press releases [2]. Kimchi.sg 03:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, appears to meet WP:CORP. MyNameIsNotBob 04:23, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep meets WP:CORP criteria. --Terence Ong 04:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep one reason being that it's quite a neatly presented article. Tyrenius 05:38, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. SorryGuy 05:38, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.