Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rigel Sauri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 01:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rigel Sauri[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor artist, notability not established. References are of regional interest only and/or self-published. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:27, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 21:56, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of attained notability found in Highbeam and Questia searches, Google only turns up user-submitted content. That leaves the unverifiable sources in the article could amount to more but appear to be just passing local coverage. Even the artist's own domain now seems to lead nowhere now. Fails WP:ARTIST. AllyD (talk) 22:05, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable per nomination. --Lockley (talk) 06:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.