Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricky O'Neill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 00:32, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ricky O'Neill[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD. The subject has only had 5 roles in various films and TV shows and most of them were as unnamed characters. They don't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:ENTERTAINER. Dismas|^(talk) 08:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support First, I notify you all that I nominated it for deletion the first time (successfully), I tried then to find more sources than IMDB and also left a non-generic paragraph of advice to try to help the user with the article to give it a chance of being kept, but so far it doesn't look like they've taken the advice. CaptRik (talk) 19:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well I did try a reference tvrage but it is unfortunate that is on the Wikipedia:Spam_blacklist. The newspaper article is a cpoy of of tvrage article I really don't qualified to try to fix this article. Perhaps it should be deleted.......... Venustar84 (talk) 20:11, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER. ukexpat (talk) 17:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.