Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricky Graham
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Renata 05:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ricky Graham[edit]
Non-notable musician. None of the listed labels seem particularly notable, fails WP:MUSIC. —Swpb talk contribs 02:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- non notable musician. Self promotion. Bearly541 02:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MER-C 03:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vanity, nn. --MasterA113 03:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sharkface217 04:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Keep He is somewhat notable, as he is a signed musician. Remember, just because he's not a huge star like Bob Dylan doesn't mean he isn't notable. Sharkface217 04:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. shotwell 05:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN musician, don't believe getting signed to any label brings notariety. SkierRMH,06:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. TSO1D 01:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete absolutely fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musicians. May well become notable before long if the claims of the article are correct, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Xtifr tälk 20:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:MUSIC. —ShadowHalo 23:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.