Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Soukoulis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Soukoulis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently "reviewed" by a new user with no other contributions and they then removed my PROD with the basis that his career is sufficient for notability; but none of it, including after examinations shows convincing for his independent notability. Searches are not finding better than a few simply mentions. SwisterTwister talk 17:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:55, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing in the sources actually about Soukoulis, and too many sources about Western Bancorp, his own thing, are primary - David Gerard (talk) 11:57, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO. This is a weakly sourced vanity page with no indication of the subject's notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pretty clear vanity page, agree with the above editors on all their well-made points CrispyGlover (talk) 20:31, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Definitely WP:PROMO. -- Dane2007 ^talk 21:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.