Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Lavoie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Lavoie[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject has not received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Google and Proquest searches only come up with sources that have an interest in the written topic (i.e. press releases for speaking engagements). – Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:32, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:32, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:32, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, also article is bordering on advertising -Drdisque (talk) 17:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:19, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – per nom. Hard to find independent sources. There were 20 to 30 cites in GS for some of the books, but doesn't seem like enough. – Margin1522 (talk) 22:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

This is stupid. Every Inclusive Education course in every teachers training degree at every university in the world cites this guy but the deletionist fascists insist on deletion. Richard Lavoie is notable. Ryan Albrey (talk) 03:38, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]