Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richmond Shepard (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure). "Pepper" @ 05:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Richmond Shepard[edit]

Richmond Shepard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD closed as WP:NPASR. Shepard does not meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. It needs proper investigation, as it has been tagged for notability for almost nine years. Boleyn (talk) 19:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kostas20142 (talk) 12:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I believe that The Times and The New Yorker sources above are sufficient to meet WP:GNG (two articles in prominent publications centered on the person in question). His role in Noo Yawk Tawk ("conceived and directed") would go half way towards meeting WP:ENT, provided Noo Yawk Tawk itself is a notable show, which I must say does not appear fully certain. GregorB (talk) 14:59, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per GregorB ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 19:23, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw nomination per above. Boleyn (talk) 19:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As per, Mahveotm and GregorB Article meets WP:GNG come on guys!!Celestina007 (talk) 21:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.