Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richie Roman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per consensus. Chillum 17:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Richie Roman[edit]

This reeks of self-promotion. Considered a speedy but the participation with Tabatha's Salon Takeover made me think this was a better option. Completely not notable. A ni Mate 02:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Main contributor is subject of article. I stinks of WP:OR even more. --Lord ₪Sunday 02:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this unsourced autobiography. The lone footnote leads to his website. Cliff smith ^talk 02:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Normally I'm okay with stubs, but this particular article is actually bad for Wikipedia. The only source for the article is the actual page.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, lets see...WP:OR, WP:N, WP:V... Hmm it violates all three of them. RockManQ (talk) 03:00, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball, or can I post my business card on Wikipedia too? ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not verifiable. Not notable. Can almost be db-bio. --N Shar (talk · contribs) 18:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.