Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richat Structure (Atlantis fringe theory)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As pointed out, all relevant info already in the parent article. Tone 18:31, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richat Structure (Atlantis fringe theory)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Thus is a copy and paste for here [[1]] with a couple of lines added. Not sure if I should regard it as a fork, as it really is the same material.Slatersteven (talk) 15:49, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The idea is that the section in Location hypotheses of Atlantis is too long, it needs to mention the two waves that this fringe theory has undergone and the different "reasons" underpinning them. It doesn't really need an extensive discussion about the more detailed aspects of how the theory underwent fame as a viral event (Viral video, tabloids, and mainstream press) which logically could find a home here in a more detailed article. Keizers (talk) 17:44, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. MrClog (talk) 16:17, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mauritius-related deletion discussions. MrClog (talk) 16:17, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I see. Then it might have been a goods idea to have done that first, or even at any point after this AFD was launched. At this time it is a duplication, for which there is no justification.Slatersteven (talk) 17:46, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:37, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Slatersteven, I did that here. Can we keep this article now? Keizers (talk) 22:34, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Please. Mlewan (talk) 06:09, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The parent article covers it already. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not anymore, it was too much information for the parent article and I've edited it down to an appropriate amount.Keizers (talk) 01:17, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.