Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Young (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Young (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. He's had many small roles, but there are no reliable sources to base this article on, and he's never had a major role. The closest, I think, was a recurring role on a short-lived NBC soap opera. Pburka (talk) 20:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing my previous PROD, I forgot that he did star in Eye of the Widow. I still don't think this is sufficient, though. Pburka (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 07:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Incredibly weak keep. His part in the opening of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is really memorable, plus he got fifth billing in An Innocent Man. Throw in some minor roles in major films and starring roles in minor ones, and I think he may just barely squeak by. Then again, it wouldn't pain me too much if this was deleted. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:16, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 14:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: I can't find any sources, but his many roles in 20th century films and television shows indicates offline sourcing may be available. Esquivalience ^t 00:46, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - seems to pass WP:NACTOR, had many roles in notable films, some (according to cast lists) seem to have been significantly supporting. Kraxler (talk) 19:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.