Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard W Turner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Richard W Turner[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the sources cited are about Turner himself. The only thing in here that could potentially be notable is the tennis, but I can't find any sources to back that up. agtx 22:51, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:00, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looks like it should/could be a notable subject but I cannot find independent / secondary references for the significant majority of the article. If someone can properly reference the article it would be good. Aoziwe (talk) 13:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
strong delete looks like blatant self promotional. Almost all of it is not backed with reliable sources. LibStar (talk) 03:37, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per LibStar, WP:SNOW, and WP:NOTRESUME as a blatantly Not Notable. The sources are all PR stunts and self-created pieces. Bearian (talk) 14:20, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.