Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Vaughan (teacher)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 12:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Vaughan (teacher)[edit]

Possibly non-notable individual. There is one article about Vaughan Systems [1] in El Mundo but not much else that I can find. Regents Park (RegentsPark) 04:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —TerriersFan (talk) 17:16, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:14, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't find anything on him and he's currently failing WP:TEACHER. DARTH PANDA ^duel 01:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, either through WP:BIO or through WP:TEACHER. Theseeker4 (talk) 18:06, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO badly. Michellecrisp (talk) 22:56, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails to comply the criteria laid in WP:TEACHER. --Efe (talk) 11:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Twilight1701 (talk) 17:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have added some additional references to support the subject's notability and the contents of the stub. The referenced elmundo.es 2005 article contains significant independent coverage of the subject and his teaching activities. In my opinion it passes WP:N. Wronkiew (talk) 19:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - fails the guideline for academics but narrowly meets the general notability guideline as has been the subject of limited coverage in reliable secondary sources, for example here ~~and here~~. The two guidelines are independent of each other - passing either one is sufficient. The article also includes some Spanish-language links from reliable sources which clearly feature Vaughan in some detail, though the precise content requires better language skills than mine. On balance, the coverage in reliable secondary sources is present if a little limited, and with some good faith re the Spanish language references it seems sufficient to meet the notability criteria. Euryalus (talk) 05:54, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment your 2nd reference above appears to be a self published source. Michellecrisp (talk) 05:57, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - you're right, my apologies. I've struck it out and amended my view to Weak Keep. Euryalus (talk) 06:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.