Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Simpson (academic)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Richard Simpson (academic)[edit]
- Richard Simpson (academic) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Prodded and deprodded a long time ago, discussion on talk page shows ambivalence about notability. Three years later, still an assistant prof, his h-index is somewhere between 3 and 13. Joey the Mango (talk) 04:02, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Joey the Mango (talk) 04:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not even an assertion of significance or importance and it would be impossible to support such an assertion, is not notable by WP:PROF or WP:NOTE. Drawn Some (talk) 13:08, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:PROF. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep appears to be one of the notable people in this specific speciality of voice-controlled wheel-chairs. DGG (talk) 16:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence that the notability guidelines for inclusion have been satisfied. Dawn Bard (talk) 17:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Completely fails WP:PROF. I found his bio but it merely confirms lack of notability. There are a lot of assistant professors with a PhD and several papers, which is why WP:PROF was developed. Johnuniq (talk) 11:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.