Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Prosser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 21:09, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Prosser[edit]

This person isn't notable. Unsuccessful candidate from a very minor party Randomkiwi 04:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agree with nom.-gadfium 04:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions.
Delete — Delete per nom as another obscure, minor, local politician who's ultimately not-notable. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 07:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. MER-C 09:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable, even within NZ. Not only that, but there's potential confusion with Richard Bissell Prosser, and, as has already happened, Richard B.'s father who is also a Richard ("Birmingham, England, engineer and inventor" who could be notable) --Dom 01:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A quick search on Wikipedia shows this is not a hoax article and Richard Prosser is indeed a Zealand democratic candidate. This is a major party I seen no reason for deletion. Simpleerob 05:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Minor candidate from very minor party (less than 0.5% of vote). Not a major party official and not prominant in other areas - SimonLyall 10:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.